Which of the following statements best captures the idea of rehabilitation of a witness?

Which of the following statements best captures the idea of rehabilitation of a witness?

• A. Completely disregarding previous testimony
• B. Strengthening a witness's previous statements through additional evidence
• C. Ending all discussions with the witness
• D. Limiting the witness's testimony to certain topics

Answer: (B)

The concept of rehabilitation of a witness refers to the process of reinforcing the credibility and reliability of a witness’s testimony, especially after it has faced scrutiny or challenge. The correct answer emphasizes the practice of bolstering a witness's previous statements by correlating them with additional evidence or information that supports their initial claims. This approach aims to restore confidence in the witness's reliability, especially in the context of legal proceedings where the credibility of testimony may come into question. Other options present alternative actions that do not align with the purpose of rehabilitation. Disregarding previous testimony would undermine the witness's credibility rather than enhance it. Ending all discussions with the witness would negate any opportunity to clarify or reinforce their testimony. Finally, limiting testimony to certain topics could restrict the richness of the information provided and does not seek to strengthen the witness's overall credibility. Thus, the choice that truly embodies the rehabilitation concept is to strengthen previous statements with additional evidence.

The concept of rehabilitation of a witness refers to the process of reinforcing the credibility and reliability of a witness’s testimony, especially after it has faced scrutiny or challenge. The correct answer emphasizes the practice of bolstering a witness's previous statements by correlating them with additional evidence or information that supports their initial claims. This approach aims to restore confidence in the witness's reliability, especially in the context of legal proceedings where the credibility of testimony may come into question.

Other options present alternative actions that do not align with the purpose of rehabilitation. Disregarding previous testimony would undermine the witness's credibility rather than enhance it. Ending all discussions with the witness would negate any opportunity to clarify or reinforce their testimony. Finally, limiting testimony to certain topics could restrict the richness of the information provided and does not seek to strengthen the witness's overall credibility. Thus, the choice that truly embodies the rehabilitation concept is to strengthen previous statements with additional evidence.