Which method is incorrect when summarizing a witness's statement?

Which method is incorrect when summarizing a witness's statement?

• A. Summarizing in their own words
• B. Using the exact words spoken
• C. Providing a paraphrase
• D. Documenting the response verbatim

Answer: (A)

The method involving summarizing in one's own words is incorrect for summarizing a witness's statement. This is because an accurate representation of a witness's statement often requires maintaining the integrity and precision of the original wording. When summarizing in one’s own words, there is a risk of altering the intended meaning or omitting essential details that are crucial to a legal context. Using the exact words spoken, providing a paraphrase, and documenting the response verbatim are appropriate techniques, as they ensure that the witness's words and intent are accurately preserved. Verbatim documentation captures the exact phrasing and nuances, while paraphrasing reformulates the original statement without changing the meaning, both of which contribute to a faithful representation of the testimony.

The method involving summarizing in one's own words is incorrect for summarizing a witness's statement. This is because an accurate representation of a witness's statement often requires maintaining the integrity and precision of the original wording. When summarizing in one’s own words, there is a risk of altering the intended meaning or omitting essential details that are crucial to a legal context.

Using the exact words spoken, providing a paraphrase, and documenting the response verbatim are appropriate techniques, as they ensure that the witness's words and intent are accurately preserved. Verbatim documentation captures the exact phrasing and nuances, while paraphrasing reformulates the original statement without changing the meaning, both of which contribute to a faithful representation of the testimony.