What is one key difference between direct examination and cross-examination?

What is one key difference between direct examination and cross-examination?

• A. Direct examination allows leading questions; cross-examination does not
• B. Direct examination is performed by the opposing party; cross-examination is not
• C. Cross-examination is the initial questioning; direct examination follows
• D. Direct examination is handled by the attorney that called the witness; cross-examination is not

Answer: (D)

The key difference highlighted in the correct answer pertains to the roles played by attorneys during the examination of witnesses in a legal setting. During direct examination, the attorney who has called the witness is the one who asks questions. This allows the attorney to establish the witness's testimony in a manner that supports their case, guiding the witness to present their information in a clear and coherent manner. On the other hand, cross-examination involves the opposing party’s attorney questioning the witness. The purpose of cross-examination is to challenge the testimony provided during direct examination, test the credibility of the witness, and potentially elicit information that could undermine the witness's previous statements. The other options provide inaccuracies regarding the nature of these examinations. For instance, leading questions are typically not allowed during direct examination to preserve the integrity of the testimony, and initial questioning typically aligns with direct examination. Thus, understanding the roles and sequence of these examinations clarifies their distinct purposes in a court trial.

The key difference highlighted in the correct answer pertains to the roles played by attorneys during the examination of witnesses in a legal setting. During direct examination, the attorney who has called the witness is the one who asks questions. This allows the attorney to establish the witness's testimony in a manner that supports their case, guiding the witness to present their information in a clear and coherent manner.

On the other hand, cross-examination involves the opposing party’s attorney questioning the witness. The purpose of cross-examination is to challenge the testimony provided during direct examination, test the credibility of the witness, and potentially elicit information that could undermine the witness's previous statements.

The other options provide inaccuracies regarding the nature of these examinations. For instance, leading questions are typically not allowed during direct examination to preserve the integrity of the testimony, and initial questioning typically aligns with direct examination. Thus, understanding the roles and sequence of these examinations clarifies their distinct purposes in a court trial.